Waterberg District Municipality (DC36)

Contact details

Postal: Private Bag X1018, Modimolle, 0510
Physical: Harry Gwala Street, Modimolle
Tel: 014 718 3300
Fax: 014 717 3886
Web: www.waterberg.gov.za

Municipal Information

Area: 44 913km²
Cities/Towns: Amandelbult Mine Town, Bela-Bela (Warmbad), Lephalale (Ellisras), Modimolle (Nylstroom), Mokopane (Potgietersrus), Mookgophong (Naboomspruit), Pienaarsrivier, Thabazimbi, Vaalwater
Main Economic Sectors: Mining, agriculture, tourism

Demographic Information

Population: 679 336
Households: 179 866
Population Growth: 1.16% p.a.
Unemployment Rate: 28.10%
More

Political Management

Composition of Council: ANC 27, DA 6, COPE 1
Mayor: Mrs N R Mogotlane
Other Members of Council: B S Mhlanga (Social Development), Z Mosam (Budget and Treasury), K S Lamola (Infrastructure Development), M L Moremi (Transformation and Administration), S M Molekwa (Planning and Economic Development), M M Mogotsi (Special Projects), B S Mhlanga (Social Development), R Z Moeletsi (Community Services)

Administrative Management

Municipal Manager: Mr Mpheta Samuel Mabotja
Chief Financial Officer: Mrs Nadine Laubscher
Communications Officer: Pat Malete
LED Officer: Leonard Sole
Other Senior Management: Peter Makondo (Manager: Executive Support), Leonard Sole (Planning and Economic Development), Mabora Mamba (Social Development and Community Services), Regina Makgata (Infrastructure Development), Leonard Sole (Planning and Economic Development)

Financial Information

All values: R'0002013/142012/132011/12
AUDIT OUTCOME n/aQualified audit opinionClean audit outcome
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Property rates---
Service charges1 671719652
Investment revenue5 8146 1777 402
Transfers recognised - operational101 31193 44299 298
Other own revenue2 6231 324310
Total Revenue (excluding capital transfers and contributions)111 419101 662107 662
Employee costs53 16950 87144 737
Remuneration of councillors5 9925 4734 979
Depreciation & asset impairment6 7327 6475 107
Finance charges---
Materials and bulk purchases---
Transfers and grants23 37524 21326 299
Other expenditure30 67530 18827 163
Total Expenditure119 943118 392108 285
Surplus/(Deficit)(8 524)(16 730)(623)
Transfers recognised - capital---
Contributions recognised - capital & contributed assets--(200)
Surplus/(Deficit) after capital transfers & contributions(8 524)(16 730)(823)
Share of surplus/(deficit) of associate---
Surplus/(Deficit) for the year(8 524)(16 730)(823)
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE & FUNDS SOURCES
Capital expenditure6 9908 33910 685
Transfers recognised - capital---
Public contributions & donations---
Borrowing---
Internally generated funds6 9908 33910 685
Total sources of capital funds6 9908 33910 685
FINANCIAL POSITION
Total current assets95 351109 800124 804
Total non current assets64 26361 53260 184
Total current liabilities8 43011 53210 874
Total non current liabilities13 74713 83812 852
Community wealth/Equity137 437145 962161 262
CASH FLOWS
Net cash from (used) operating(4 456)(5 836)(11 172)
Net cash from (used) investing(6 990)(7 919)-
Net cash from (used) financing---
Cash/cash equivalents at the year end92 27383 98597 739
UNAUTHORISED, IRREGULAR, FRUITLESS & WASTEFUL EXPENDITURE
Unauthorised expendituren/a--
Irregular expendituren/a-7
Fruitless & wasteful expendituren/a-24
SOURCES71 UnauditedS71 AuditedS71 Audited
Notes:
  1. S71 Unaudited figures are sourced from the MFMA S71 4th Quarter Schedule C reports, made available by the National Treasury. The schedules are available at http://mfma.treasury.gov.za/Media_Releases/s71/Pages/default.aspx.
  2. S71 Audited figures are prior year audited figures sourced from the MFMA S71 Schedule C reports.
  3. If the relevant S71 Schedule C figures are unavailable, prior year audited figures may be taken from the relevant Audited Financial Statements. The source is then indicated as AFS. Links are provided under the Resources section on this site.
  4. S71 Schedule C reports are in the format for monthly and quarterly municipal financial statements as prescribed by the Municipal Budget and Reporting Regulations. S71 Schedule C figures are standardised to the prescribed format and may differ from figures shown in the Audited Financial Statements. Where we have captured figures directly from the Audited Financial Statements, we have endeavoured to follow the S71 Schedule C format.
  5. Unauthorised, Irregular, Fruitless and Wasteful Expenditure is sourced from the Consolidated general report on the audit outcomes of local government, published annually by the Auditor-General South Africa. If the figures are unavailable in this report, they may be sourced from the Annual Financial Statements of the relevant municipality.
  6. All figures are rounded to the nearest R'000. R0 values are reflected as ‘-’. Values that are unavailable are reflected as ‘n/a’.

Tender/Procurement Information

Tenders are published on the municipal website, and in the City Press and Sowetan newspapers.

LED Activities

Key Projects: Lephalale Agricultural Corridor; development of Makapan's Valley World Heritage Site; resuscitation of Waterberg Economic Development Agency; Waterberg Biosphere Reserve and Meander; Vaalwater Beautification.
Key Investment Opportunities: Agricultural Fresh Produce Market; conferencing and hospitality facilities.

Links/Resources

Municipal Tenders
Annual Reports
Annual Report 2012/13
Annual Report 2011/12
Audited Financial Statements
AFS 2012/13
AFS 2011/12
AFS 2010/11
Integrated Development Plans
IDP 2012/13
IDP 2011/12
MFMA Section 71 – Schedule C
Schedule C 2013/14
Schedule C 2012/13
Schedule C 2011/12

The information in this directory is supplied and/or externally sourced and is also subject to continual change. If you notice any errors or omissions, please contact us at info@municipalities.co.za so that we can correct it.

Blue Drop Scores

The Blue Drop Scores are sourced from the annual Blue Drop Reports published by The Department: Water Affairs. The Municipal Blue Drop Score is a performance indicator of the overall municipal drinking water quality management performance of the relevant municipality. The score relates to not only the quality of the drinking water, but also contains a risk management measure relating to the ability of the responsible authority to sustain the quality of drinking water and also to deal with any incidents that may pose a health risk to the public. The maximum score is 100 and the target of excellence is 95%.

Green Drop Scores

The Green Drop Scores are sourced from the annual Green Drop Reports published by The Department: Water Affairs. The Municipal Green Drop Score is a performance indicator of the overall municipal wastewater business practice and compliance of the relevant municipality. The maximum score is 100.

Close

Financial Audit Outcomes

The objective of an audit of financial statements is to express an opinion on whether the financial statements fairly represent the financial position of the auditee at financial year-end and the results of its operations for the financial year.

The Auditor-General can express one of the following audit opinions:

Clean audit outcome: The financial statements are free from material misstatements (in other words, a financially unqualified audit opinion) and there are no material findings on reporting on performance objectives or non-compliance with legislation.

Financially unqualified with findings: The financial statements contain no material misstatements. Unless the Auditor General expresses a clean audit outcome, findings have been raised on either reporting on predetermined objectives or non-compliance with legislation, or both these aspects.

Qualified audit opinion: The financial statements contain material misstatements in specific amounts, or there is insufficient evidence for the Auditor General to conclude that specific amounts included in the financial statements are not materially misstated.

Adverse audit opinion: The financial statements contain material misstatements that are not confined to specific amounts, or the misstatements represent a substantial portion of the financial statements.

Disclaimer of audit opinion: The auditee provided insufficient evidence in the form of documentation on which to base an audit opinion. The lack of sufficient evidence is not confined to specific amounts, or represents a substantial portion of the information contained in the financial statements.

Close

Resident Queries


Telephone Number Email Address
Accounts
Electricity
Refuse & Waste Removal
Roads
Service Delivery
Water

Close